🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Fake COAs — my results so far Page 2

⚠ Fake COAs — my results so far

Dr.GastroMayo Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 4:08 AM 6 replies 764 viewsPage 2 of 2
fiona_VT
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Vermont
Nov 18, 2025 at 6:58 AM#6
I'm a digital forensics consultant and I want to add some technical methods for detecting fake COAs: PDF Metadata Analysis: - Right-click the PDF > Properties > look at "Created with" field - Real lab reports: created with ChemStation, Empower, MassHunter, or similar analytical software - Fake reports: created with Adobe Photoshop, Canva, Microsoft Word, Google Docs Image Analysis: - Save the HPLC chromatogram image and do a reverse Google Image search - Run through an Error Level Analysis tool (fotoforensics.com) to detect image manipulation - Look for JPEG artifacts around text that suggest editing Document Consistency: - All text should be the same resolution - Zoom to 400% — edited text often shows aliasing differences - Check if text is selectable (real reports usually have selectable text, photoshopped ones are flat images) These methods caught 3 fake COAs that looked convincing at normal zoom.
50 13mark_tokyo, hans_munich, jason_sac26 and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike.trainer_LA
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Apr 2024
Los Angeles, CA
Nov 18, 2025 at 7:15 AM#7
As someone who runs a legitimate peptide company (I won't name it here to avoid appearing self-promotional), I want to say that the post above is 100% accurate and it's a huge problem for honest vendors too. We spend $3,000-5,000 per month on third-party testing. Every batch gets tested. Real testing is EXPENSIVE. When a scam vendor posts a fake COA and sells at half our price, customers wonder why they should pay more. The answer is: because real testing costs real money, and real peptides cost real money to manufacture properly. If a vendor's prices seem impossibly low AND they have "perfect" COAs, ask yourself how they can afford both the product AND the testing at that price point. Usually the answer is: they can't, and at least one of those things is fake.
Last edited: Nov 18, 2025 at 11:15 AM
31 1newstart_MO, mia_MS2, LeilaHI and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Nov 18, 2025 at 7:32 AM#8
This thread is being added to the wiki as required reading. Understanding COA verification is a fundamental skill for anyone buying peptides. Quick Reference — COA Verification Steps: 1. Check if the lab exists (Google the name, address, phone) 2. Verify the lab is accredited (look up in accreditation databases) 3. Contact the lab directly to verify the specific report number 4. Check that the batch number on the COA matches your vial 5. Examine the PDF metadata 6. If chromatogram is included, verify it's not stolen from another source If a vendor refuses to provide a COA, or if their COA fails any of these checks, do not buy from them.
Last edited: Nov 18, 2025 at 1:32 PM
42 16RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Nov 18, 2025 at 7:49 AM#9
One final point I want to emphasize: a COA is only as trustworthy as the lab that issued it AND your ability to verify it. The scammers know that most buyers won't verify. They count on it. They know that a professional-looking PDF with some numbers on it is enough to satisfy 90% of buyers. Be in the 10%. Verify. Test. Protect yourself and this community. Every fake COA we expose makes it harder for the next scammer. I'll continue reviewing COAs that members submit. If you want me to look at a vendor's COA, DM me with the PDF and I'll give you my honest assessment.
33 6bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ Finnrick exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register