🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOral GLP-1 AgonistsOrforglipron Phase 3 ATTAIN-1 topline — oral non-peptide GLP-1 Page 2

Orforglipron Phase 3 ATTAIN-1 topline — oral non-peptide GLP-1

TrialTracker_MD Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 8:45 AM 16 replies 288 viewsPage 2 of 4
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
Mar 13, 2026 at 11:35 AM#6

The manufacturing economics here are worth emphasizing. Current estimates for injectable GLP-1 manufacturing cost:

  • Semaglutide: ~$40-80/month (peptide synthesis + formulation + device)
  • Tirzepatide: ~$50-100/month (similar)

Estimated manufacturing cost for an oral small molecule like orforglipron: $2-5/month.

Even with typical pharmaceutical markup, this opens the door to dramatically lower pricing. If Lilly prices orforglipron at $400-500/month instead of $1,000+, the volume could more than make up for the per-unit revenue reduction. And it would undercut the compounding pharmacy market significantly.

38 3maya_sedona, stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Mar 13, 2026 at 11:52 AM#7

That manufacturing cost difference is staggering. But let's be real — pharmaceutical companies don't price based on manufacturing cost, they price based on what the market will bear. I wouldn't be surprised if Lilly prices orforglipron at $800-900/month, just slightly below injectables, and pockets the margin difference.

The real price pressure will come when generics/competitors enter the oral GLP-1 space. Pfizer's danuglipron, AZ's oral candidates, etc.

Last edited: Mar 13, 2026 at 12:52 PM
44 16FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Mar 13, 2026 at 12:09 PM#8

Good thread. One thing to add: the ATTAIN-3 trial is a head-to-head comparison of orforglipron vs. injectable semaglutide 2.4mg. That readout will be incredibly important because it will directly answer the question of how much efficacy you're trading for convenience.

If orforglipron gets within 2-3 percentage points of injectable semaglutide, that's a huge win for the oral formulation. If the gap is larger than 5 percentage points, it becomes a harder sell for patients who prioritize results.

Either way, more options is better for patients. Not everyone needs maximum-potency treatment.

14 15RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Mar 13, 2026 at 12:26 PM#9

Also worth watching: Lilly has hinted at developing an oral triple agonist as a follow-on to orforglipron. If you can get triple agonism (GLP-1/GIP/GCG) in a pill form with even 70-80% of the efficacy of injectable retatrutide, that's the holy grail. Small molecule, oral, cheap to manufacture, no cold chain.

We're probably 5-7 years away from that, but the direction of travel is clear: the future of obesity pharmacotherapy is oral, not injectable.

35 5Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Oral semaglutide 50mg (Rybelsus HD) — OASIS program results12 replies
Danuglipron BID dosing — Pfizer oral GLP-1 update7 replies
Oral vs injectable GLP-1: bioavailability and efficacy comparison5 replies
Orforglipron food interaction profile — no fasting requirement15 replies
Oral sema absorption enhancer SNAC — how it works10 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register