🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOral GLP-1 AgonistsIs oral sema actually as effective as the injection version? — 12 month update

Is oral sema actually as effective as the injection version? — 12 month update

tommy_boulder Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 3:17 AM 35 replies 1,548 viewsPage 1 of 7
tommy_boulder
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Boulder, CO
Sep 20, 2025 at 4:42 AM#1

One trend in the pipeline that doesn't get enough attention: the move toward monthly (or even less frequent) dosing. Current GLP-1 agonists require weekly injections, but several companies are developing ultra-long-acting formulations.

The most advanced is ecnoglutide (formerly known as XW004), a GLP-1 receptor agonist engineered for monthly subcutaneous dosing. Early clinical data showed:

  • Sustained GLP-1 receptor engagement over 4+ weeks from a single injection
  • Preliminary weight loss data suggesting comparable efficacy to weekly GLP-1 RAs
  • Acceptable tolerability profile (though GI events at injection were noted)

Other monthly approaches in development:

  • Novo Nordisk: Investigating long-acting depot formulations of semaglutide
  • Various biotechs: Exploring implantable devices, microparticle formulations, and antibody-drug conjugates for extended release

The obvious appeal: inject once a month instead of four times. Better adherence, fewer injection-site reactions, and potentially smoother pharmacokinetics without weekly peaks and troughs.

12 6paul_denver, TinaHashiRN, robert_kc and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SurgeonPGH
Senior Member
1,345
6,789
Mar 2024
Pittsburgh, PA
Sep 20, 2025 at 4:59 AM#2

Monthly injections would be AMAZING. I actually forget my weekly tirzepatide injection about once every 6 weeks. I set reminders but life gets busy, I'm traveling, whatever. Having to remember only 12 times per year instead of 52 would help a lot with adherence.

My concern though — what happens if you get terrible nausea from a monthly dose? With weekly injections, you know the side effects will ease up in a day or two. With a monthly depot, are you stuck being nauseous for weeks? 😰

Last edited: Sep 20, 2025 at 7:59 AM
3 10TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LeslieOBGYN
Member
567
2,567
May 2024
Dallas, TX
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:16 AM#3

That's actually the biggest pharmacological challenge with monthly formulations. The slow-release kinetics should theoretically produce more stable drug levels (avoiding the peak-and-trough pattern of weekly dosing), which might actually reduce GI side effects since many of them correlate with the post-injection peak.

However, the flip side is exactly what you described: if a patient has an adverse reaction, you can't easily "un-inject" a depot formulation. With weekly dosing, you can skip a dose, reduce the dose, or wait it out for a few days. A monthly depot releases drug continuously for 4 weeks regardless.

This is likely why the clinical development programs for monthly GLP-1s will need very careful dose titration protocols and may require starting patients on weekly formulations first to confirm tolerability before switching to monthly.

40 0james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:33 AM#4

Adherence data supports the argument for less frequent dosing. A meta-analysis of chronic disease medications showed:

  • Daily dosing: ~50-60% adherence at 12 months
  • Weekly dosing: ~60-70% adherence at 12 months
  • Monthly dosing: ~70-80% adherence at 12 months

For GLP-1 specifically, real-world data shows that approximately 30-40% of patients prescribed weekly semaglutide or tirzepatide are non-persistent at 12 months (stopped filling prescriptions). Some of that is cost/access, but convenience and injection burden are significant factors.

If a monthly formulation could reduce the non-persistence rate by even 10 percentage points, the population-level health impact would be enormous.

22 22Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RheumBOS
Member
567
2,345
Apr 2024
Boston, MA
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:50 AM#5

Would monthly injections be more painful since you'd need a larger dose in one shot? I already find the weekly injection uncomfortable sometimes.

13 22Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1237

Similar Threads

Orforglipron Phase 3 ATTAIN-1 topline — oral non-peptide GLP-116 replies
Oral semaglutide 50mg (Rybelsus HD) — OASIS program results12 replies
Danuglipron BID dosing — Pfizer oral GLP-1 update7 replies
Oral vs injectable GLP-1: bioavailability and efficacy comparison5 replies
Orforglipron food interaction profile — no fasting requirement15 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register