πŸͺ CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
Forumsβ€ΊPublic Squareβ€ΊAdolescent obesity: AAP guidelines and GLP-1 use in minors

Adolescent obesity: AAP guidelines and GLP-1 use in minors

PedsEndoPhilly Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 8:38 AM 22 replies 811 viewsPage 1 of 5
PedsEndoPhilly
Member
345
1,890
Jun 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 23, 2026 at 10:03 AM#1

Adolescent obesity: AAP guidelines and GLP-1 use in minors

Posting this for discussion as it's directly relevant to our public square community. I'll summarize the key findings and then share my interpretation.

Background: Adolescent obesity AAP guidelines and GLP-1 has been a topic of significant interest. The latest data adds substantially to our understanding of the efficacy and safety profile in this area.

Key findings:

  • Primary endpoint met with statistical significance (p<0.001)
  • Effect size consistent with or exceeding Phase 2 projections
  • Adverse event profile in line with the known GLP-1 receptor agonist class effects β€” primarily GI (nausea 20-25%, diarrhea 12-17%)
  • Subgroup analyses showed benefit across BMI categories, age groups, and baseline metabolic status

My interpretation:

This is meaningful for several reasons. First, it confirms that the results from earlier-phase trials are reproducible at scale. Second, the safety data with longer follow-up is reassuring. Third, the subgroup consistency suggests this isn't driven by a specific patient phenotype.

I'd love to hear from others β€” especially those with clinical or research backgrounds. What are the limitations you see? What questions remain unanswered?

References:
[1] See thread title for study identification. Full citation available via PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov.
β€” PedsEndoPhilly | Posted in Public Square
8 2sarah_TO, wendy_avl, jason_paloalto and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Feb 23, 2026 at 10:20 AM#2

Clinical perspective on Adolescent obesity AAP guidelines and:

I have managed over 200 patients on GLP-1 therapy and this topic comes up frequently. What the data shows β€” and what I see in practice β€” is that the medication works best as part of a comprehensive approach.

For this specific question, I would recommend: getting comprehensive baseline labs first.

11 24ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Feb 23, 2026 at 10:37 AM#3
CarlaRPh_TPA said:
What the data shows β€” and what I see in practice β€” is that the medication works best as part of a co

This is exactly right. CarlaRPh_TPA articulated what I have been trying to explain to my doctor for months. The Adolescent obesity AAP aspect is the most important factor.

42 23sarah_TO, wendy_avl, jason_paloalto and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter β€” Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
josh_phd_bmore
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Baltimore, MD
Feb 23, 2026 at 10:54 AM#4

Relevant to Adolescent obesity AAP β€” here is my latest bloodwork comparison:

Key improvements: A1C 7.6% β†’ 5.5%, triglycerides 193 β†’ 93 mg/dL, hsCRP 8.0 β†’ 1.1 mg/L. All on tirzepatide for 9 months.

The inflammatory marker drop is what impresses me most. Consistent with the SELECT trial's cardiovascular findings.

21 3KarenAZ_mom, zoe_NC, Dr.ObesityLA and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sean_dublin
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Dublin, IE
Feb 23, 2026 at 11:11 AM#5
CarlaRPh_TPA said:
What the data shows β€” and what I see in practice β€” is that the medication works best as part of a co

I respect CarlaRPh_TPA perspective but I think this oversimplifies things a bit. Re: Adolescent obesity AAP β€” the effect size varies considerably by population.

I am not saying CarlaRPh_TPA wrong entirely β€” just that the picture is more nuanced than a blanket statement. The SURMOUNT data specifically shows baseline BMI-dependent responses.

Last edited: Feb 23, 2026 at 12:11 PM
15 16quinn_sf, NurseLeah_Nash, gary_naperville and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
123…5

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released β€” sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns β€” evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey β€” comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register