🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCompounding & FormulationBeyond-use dating for compounded peptides — my results so far

Beyond-use dating for compounded peptides — my results so far

Dr.BariatricHTX Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 12:22 AM 12 replies 1,727 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 18 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
Dr.BariatricHTX
Senior Member
1,456
7,234
Feb 2024
Houston, TX
Aug 29, 2024 at 1:47 AM#1

Sent my compounded semaglutide (5mg/2mL vial from a 503A pharmacy) to Janoshik for third-party testing. Just got the results back:

  • Identity: Confirmed semaglutide
  • Purity (HPLC): 82.3%
  • Related substances: 17.7% degradation products

The pharmacy's own COA claims 98.2% purity. So either they're lying or something degraded between compounding and testing.

Is 82% acceptable? Should I be concerned? I've been injecting this for 3 weeks already. 😰

48 14CarlaRPh_TPA, steph_laguna, fiona_glasgow and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
robert_kc
Member
289
1,234
Oct 2024
Kansas City, MO
Aug 29, 2024 at 2:04 AM#2

82% is NOT acceptable. Full stop.

USP monograph standards for compounded injectables generally require potency between 90-110% of label claim, with most pharmacies targeting 97-103%. The FDA has cited pharmacies for products testing below 90%.

17.7% degradation products is alarming. That means nearly 1 in 5 molecules in your vial is not semaglutide — it's a breakdown product of unknown biological activity.

Questions to consider:

  1. How did you store the vial before sending to Janoshik?
  2. How was it shipped? (Temperature excursion during transit could cause degradation)
  3. When was the compounding date vs. your test date?

These factors matter because the low purity could be a storage/shipping artifact rather than a compounding quality issue. But it could also mean the pharmacy is using low-grade API.

8 9SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
Aug 29, 2024 at 2:21 AM#3

Good questions. I stored it refrigerated (2-8°C) the entire time. Shipped to Janoshik with cold packs via express courier — 2 day transit. Compounding date was Feb 12, I sent the sample March 1, so less than 3 weeks old. BUD on the vial says 90 days.

I don't think storage is the issue here.

35 24mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
Dr.SurgeonPGH
Senior Member
1,345
6,789
Mar 2024
Pittsburgh, PA
Aug 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM#4
Previously posted:
17.7% degradation products is alarming. That means nearly 1 in 5 molecules in your vial is not semaglutide

Let me add some nuance here. "Related substances" on an HPLC readout don't always mean dangerous degradation products. Some could be:

  • Des-amino variants (minor structural differences)
  • Oxidized forms (common with peptides)
  • Aggregates that partially resolved on the column

That said, 82% is still well below any reasonable standard. For context, Novo Nordisk's branded Ozempic and Wegovy typically test at 98-101% purity. Research-grade semaglutide from reputable suppliers is usually ≥95%.

I'd stop using this vial immediately and contact the pharmacy. Ask them to test a retained sample from your batch (they're required to keep one). If their retained sample also tests low, you have a serious quality issue. If theirs tests fine, then something happened during shipping to Janoshik.

Last edited: Aug 29, 2024 at 5:38 AM
33 1RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JennaRN
Senior Member
1,987
8,923
Mar 2024
Colorado
Online
Aug 29, 2024 at 2:55 AM#5

Wait, I've been using the same pharmacy. Should I be worried?? I've been on their compounded sema for 2 months and haven't had any side effects beyond the normal nausea. Does low purity mean it's dangerous or just less effective?

11 4SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

503A vs 503B compounding — regulatory framework explained4 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability: accelerated degradation study results6 replies
Lyophilized vs liquid peptides — stability and bioavailability comparison18 replies
Bacteriostatic water sourcing and sterility considerations8 replies
State-by-state compounding pharmacy regulations — 2026 map8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register