🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCompounding & FormulationUSP <797> 2023 revision impact on peptide compounding — need advice Page 3

USP <797> 2023 revision impact on peptide compounding — need advice

Dr.PulmRoch Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:53 PM 18 replies 2,010 viewsPage 3 of 4
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Jul 11, 2024 at 9:08 PM#11

+1 to CarlaRPh_TPA. Especially the point about "RaviCardio perspective but I think this ..." — I have seen the same in my own experience with USP <797> 2023 revision.

Last edited: Jul 12, 2024 at 1:08 AM
6 7sarah_TO, wendy_avl, jason_paloalto and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DebRD_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jul 11, 2024 at 9:25 PM#12

Want to share my personal experience related to USP <797> 2023 revision impact since I think it might help others in a similar situation.

I started my GLP-1 journey in October 2024 at 267 lbs with prediabetes and hypertension. My endocrinologist prescribed semaglutide 0.25mg to start.

Now, 18 months later: I am down 87 lbs, my labs have normalized, and I am off 2 of my 3 medications. The USP <797> 2023 aspect specifically was something that made a big difference in my journey.

This community helped me every step of the way.

25 1RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
zoe_NC
Member
278
1,234
Nov 2024
Charlotte, NC
Jul 11, 2024 at 9:42 PM#13

sophie_paris — that is really helpful context on USP <797> 2023 revision. Follow-up question: did you experience any side effects during this phase?

I am in a similar situation (about to start) and trying to set realistic expectations.

Last edited: Jul 11, 2024 at 10:42 PM
38 16james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
james_edin
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Edinburgh, UK
Jul 11, 2024 at 9:59 PM#14

To answer DebRD_ATL's question specifically:

From a clinical standpoint, USP <797> 2023 revision impact is something I discuss with patients regularly.

The short answer: discuss this specific situation with your prescribing provider.

The longer answer involves weighing the risk-benefit ratio for your individual situation, which I am happy to elaborate on if helpful.

50 13oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
InsuranceTom
Senior Member
1,345
7,890
Mar 2024
Connecticut
Jul 11, 2024 at 10:16 PM#15

Saving this for reference. Quality thread.

12 18jim_asheville, matt_MKE, Dr.ReproEndo and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

503A vs 503B compounding — regulatory framework explained4 replies
Compounded semaglutide stability: accelerated degradation study results6 replies
Lyophilized vs liquid peptides — stability and bioavailability comparison18 replies
Bacteriostatic water sourcing and sterility considerations8 replies
State-by-state compounding pharmacy regulations — 2026 map8 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register