🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsLab Results & BiomarkersUric acid trends on GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

Uric acid trends on GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

claudia_zurich Sun, Nov 23, 2025 at 3:02 PM 17 replies 1,125 viewsPage 1 of 4
claudia_zurich
Member
389
1,678
Jul 2024
Zurich, CH
Nov 23, 2025 at 4:27 PM#1

Uric acid trends on GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

Posting this for discussion as it's directly relevant to our lab results & biomarkers community. I'll summarize the key findings and then share my interpretation.

Background: Uric acid trends on GLP-1 anyone has been a topic of significant interest. The latest data adds substantially to our understanding of the efficacy and safety profile in this area.

Key findings:

  • Primary endpoint met with statistical significance (p<0.001)
  • Effect size consistent with or exceeding Phase 2 projections
  • Adverse event profile in line with the known GLP-1 receptor agonist class effects — primarily GI (nausea 20-25%, diarrhea 12-17%)
  • Subgroup analyses showed benefit across BMI categories, age groups, and baseline metabolic status

My interpretation:

This is meaningful for several reasons. First, it confirms that the results from earlier-phase trials are reproducible at scale. Second, the safety data with longer follow-up is reassuring. Third, the subgroup consistency suggests this isn't driven by a specific patient phenotype.

I'd love to hear from others — especially those with clinical or research backgrounds. What are the limitations you see? What questions remain unanswered?

References:
[1] See thread title for study identification. Full citation available via PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov.
— claudia_zurich | Posted in Lab Results & Biomarkers
9 12emma_london, tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.LipidDallas
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Dallas, TX
Nov 23, 2025 at 4:44 PM#2

Clinical perspective on Uric acid trends on GLP-1 anyone have:

I have managed over 200 patients on GLP-1 therapy and this topic comes up frequently. What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse events.

For this specific question, I would recommend: reviewing the relevant clinical guidelines.

40 14wei_SG, cory_ATX, lori_vegas and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Nov 23, 2025 at 5:01 PM#3
Dr.LipidDallas said:
What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse ev

This is exactly right. Dr.LipidDallas articulated what I have been trying to explain to my friends for months. The Uric acid trends on GLP-1 aspect is what made the difference for me.

32 19tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PulmRoch
Member
456
2,345
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Nov 23, 2025 at 5:18 PM#4

Relevant to Uric acid trends on GLP-1 — here is my latest bloodwork comparison:

Key improvements: A1C 8.0% → 5.3%, triglycerides 223 → 93 mg/dL, hsCRP 6.0 → 1.1 mg/L. All on tirzepatide for 15 months.

The inflammatory marker drop is what impresses me most. Consistent with the SELECT trial's cardiovascular findings.

3 5DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GutHealth
Senior Member
1,456
7,890
Mar 2024
Minnesota
Nov 23, 2025 at 5:35 PM#5
Dr.LipidDallas said:
What the data shows — and what I see in practice — is that proper titration prevents most adverse ev

I respect Dr.LipidDallas perspective but I think this oversimplifies things a bit. Re: Uric acid trends on GLP-1 — the subgroup analyses show meaningful heterogeneity.

I am not saying Dr.LipidDallas wrong entirely — just that the picture is more nuanced than a blanket statement. The SURMOUNT data specifically shows baseline BMI-dependent responses.

43 24MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Optimal lab testing frequency on GLP-1 — evidence-based schedule5 replies
A1C from 7.2 to 5.1 — my bloodwork transformation19 replies
Thyroid function monitoring on GLP-1 — TSH and free T4 trends3 replies
Lipid panel improvements mega-thread — share your numbers19 replies
Liver enzymes trending down on GLP-1 — ALT/AST normalization17 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register