πŸͺ CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
Forumsβ€ΊRetatrutide & Triple Agonistsβ€Ί24% weight loss number blew my mind - please be real

24% weight loss number blew my mind - please be real

JenPlateau Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 7:40 AM 23 replies 930 viewsPage 1 of 5
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Jan 12, 2026 at 9:05 AM#1

Update on my situation with 24% weight loss number blew my β€” wanted to follow up since some of you asked.

3 weeks since my last post and things have improved significantly. Here is what happened:

Talked to my endo about the concerns raised in my previous thread and they agreed with the community advice.

Full details below. Thanks to everyone who responded last time β€” your input genuinely made a difference.

40 18HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg, bri_stats and 37 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
TrialNerd_Beth
Senior Member
2,345
11,234
Jan 2024
Bethesda, MD
Jan 12, 2026 at 9:22 AM#2
JenPlateau said:
24% weight loss number blew my mind - please be real

I respect JenPlateau perspective but I think this oversimplifies things a bit. Re: 24% weight loss number blew my β€” the effect size varies considerably by population.

I am not saying JenPlateau wrong entirely β€” just that the picture is more nuanced than a blanket statement. The SURMOUNT data specifically shows baseline BMI-dependent responses.

Last edited: Jan 12, 2026 at 1:22 PM
39 19PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan and 36 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LondonLisa
Member
912
3,456
Mar 2024
London, UK
Jan 12, 2026 at 9:39 AM#3

+1 to JenPlateau. Especially the point about "24% weight loss number blew my mind - pl..." β€” I have seen the same in my own experience with 24% weight loss number.

Last edited: Jan 12, 2026 at 11:39 AM
10 18RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau, SallyK_inj and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich β€” Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Jan 12, 2026 at 9:56 AM#4

As a healthcare provider, I want to add some clinical context to this discussion on 24% weight loss number blew my mind -.

Building on what JenPlateau said β€” the evidence base here is well-established. The key publications to reference are from the SURMOUNT program[1].

Key clinical points:

  1. Efficacy is dose-dependent and typically requires 4-5 weeks to reach steady state
  2. Side effect profile is predictable and usually manageable with standard protocols
  3. Monitoring should include baseline labs and follow-up at 3-month intervals
  4. Patient education significantly improves outcomes and adherence

Standard disclaimer: this is educational, not individualized medical advice.

References:
[1] See thread title for relevant study identification.
9 14Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LabKate
Senior Member
2,678
11,234
Jan 2024
Oregon
Jan 12, 2026 at 10:13 AM#5
LondonLisa said:
Especially the point about "24% weight loss number blew my mind - pl

Gonna push back on this one. 24% weight loss number blew my mind is not that straightforward in my experience. I have been on this for 18 months and the reality is messier than the trials suggest.

Don't get me wrong β€” the medication works. But adherence is harder than people admit. We should be honest about that.

11 9labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
123…5

Similar Threads

TRIUMPH-3 topline results β€” 24.2% body weight loss at 48 weeks10 replies
Retatrutide mechanism: GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonism explained5 replies
Retatrutide Phase 2 dose-response analysis β€” optimal dose range10 replies
Glucagon receptor agonism and hepatic lipid oxidation β€” MASH implications13 replies
Retatrutide vs tirzepatide β€” dual vs triple agonist comparison22 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register