🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsRetatrutide & Triple AgonistsPatient preference: weekly injection vs potential monthly depot — need advice

Patient preference: weekly injection vs potential monthly depot — need advice

BrianDallas92 Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 3:44 AM 32 replies 1,267 viewsPage 1 of 7
BrianDallas92
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Dallas, TX
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:09 AM#1

One trend in the pipeline that doesn't get enough attention: the move toward monthly (or even less frequent) dosing. Current GLP-1 agonists require weekly injections, but several companies are developing ultra-long-acting formulations.

The most advanced is ecnoglutide (formerly known as XW004), a GLP-1 receptor agonist engineered for monthly subcutaneous dosing. Early clinical data showed:

  • Sustained GLP-1 receptor engagement over 4+ weeks from a single injection
  • Preliminary weight loss data suggesting comparable efficacy to weekly GLP-1 RAs
  • Acceptable tolerability profile (though GI events at injection were noted)

Other monthly approaches in development:

  • Novo Nordisk: Investigating long-acting depot formulations of semaglutide
  • Various biotechs: Exploring implantable devices, microparticle formulations, and antibody-drug conjugates for extended release

The obvious appeal: inject once a month instead of four times. Better adherence, fewer injection-site reactions, and potentially smoother pharmacokinetics without weekly peaks and troughs.

26 0Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CarlaRPh_TPA
Senior Member
1,890
8,234
Jan 2024
Tampa, FL
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:26 AM#2

Monthly injections would be AMAZING. I actually forget my weekly tirzepatide injection about once every 6 weeks. I set reminders but life gets busy, I'm traveling, whatever. Having to remember only 12 times per year instead of 52 would help a lot with adherence.

My concern though — what happens if you get terrible nausea from a monthly dose? With weekly injections, you know the side effects will ease up in a day or two. With a monthly depot, are you stuck being nauseous for weeks? 😰

10 11ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
Sep 20, 2025 at 5:43 AM#3

That's actually the biggest pharmacological challenge with monthly formulations. The slow-release kinetics should theoretically produce more stable drug levels (avoiding the peak-and-trough pattern of weekly dosing), which might actually reduce GI side effects since many of them correlate with the post-injection peak.

However, the flip side is exactly what you described: if a patient has an adverse reaction, you can't easily "un-inject" a depot formulation. With weekly dosing, you can skip a dose, reduce the dose, or wait it out for a few days. A monthly depot releases drug continuously for 4 weeks regardless.

This is likely why the clinical development programs for monthly GLP-1s will need very careful dose titration protocols and may require starting patients on weekly formulations first to confirm tolerability before switching to monthly.

Last edited: Sep 20, 2025 at 11:43 AM
22 2tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
Sep 20, 2025 at 6:00 AM#4

Adherence data supports the argument for less frequent dosing. A meta-analysis of chronic disease medications showed:

  • Daily dosing: ~50-60% adherence at 12 months
  • Weekly dosing: ~60-70% adherence at 12 months
  • Monthly dosing: ~70-80% adherence at 12 months

For GLP-1 specifically, real-world data shows that approximately 30-40% of patients prescribed weekly semaglutide or tirzepatide are non-persistent at 12 months (stopped filling prescriptions). Some of that is cost/access, but convenience and injection burden are significant factors.

If a monthly formulation could reduce the non-persistence rate by even 10 percentage points, the population-level health impact would be enormous.

50 14james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SaraMom3
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
Ohio
Sep 20, 2025 at 6:17 AM#5

Would monthly injections be more painful since you'd need a larger dose in one shot? I already find the weekly injection uncomfortable sometimes.

10 19ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1237

Similar Threads

TRIUMPH-3 topline results — 24.2% body weight loss at 48 weeks10 replies
Retatrutide mechanism: GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonism explained5 replies
Retatrutide Phase 2 dose-response analysis — optimal dose range10 replies
Glucagon receptor agonism and hepatic lipid oxidation — MASH implications13 replies
Retatrutide vs tirzepatide — dual vs triple agonist comparison22 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register