🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingBatch-to-batch purity variation — acceptable ranges

Batch-to-batch purity variation — acceptable ranges

kate.chem Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 4:15 AM 15 replies 505 viewsPage 1 of 3
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Mar 11, 2026 at 5:40 AM#1

Sent my compounded semaglutide (5mg/2mL vial from a 503A pharmacy) to Janoshik for third-party testing. Just got the results back:

  • Identity: Confirmed semaglutide
  • Purity (HPLC): 82.3%
  • Related substances: 17.7% degradation products

The pharmacy's own COA claims 98.2% purity. So either they're lying or something degraded between compounding and testing.

Is 82% acceptable? Should I be concerned? I've been injecting this for 3 weeks already. 😰

26 18steve_okc, dave_SLC, FDA_TrackerJim and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NephBHM_UK
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Birmingham, UK
Mar 11, 2026 at 5:57 AM#2

82% is NOT acceptable. Full stop.

USP monograph standards for compounded injectables generally require potency between 90-110% of label claim, with most pharmacies targeting 97-103%. The FDA has cited pharmacies for products testing below 90%.

17.7% degradation products is alarming. That means nearly 1 in 5 molecules in your vial is not semaglutide — it's a breakdown product of unknown biological activity.

Questions to consider:

  1. How did you store the vial before sending to Janoshik?
  2. How was it shipped? (Temperature excursion during transit could cause degradation)
  3. When was the compounding date vs. your test date?

These factors matter because the low purity could be a storage/shipping artifact rather than a compounding quality issue. But it could also mean the pharmacy is using low-grade API.

50 8EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
GraceAZ_72
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Tucson, AZ
Mar 11, 2026 at 6:14 AM#3

Good questions. I stored it refrigerated (2-8°C) the entire time. Shipped to Janoshik with cold packs via express courier — 2 day transit. Compounding date was Feb 12, I sent the sample March 1, so less than 3 weeks old. BUD on the vial says 90 days.

I don't think storage is the issue here.

28 14SallyK_inj, CryptoCarl, MariaRD and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides
sean_dublin
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Dublin, IE
Mar 11, 2026 at 6:31 AM#4
Previously posted:
17.7% degradation products is alarming. That means nearly 1 in 5 molecules in your vial is not semaglutide

Let me add some nuance here. "Related substances" on an HPLC readout don't always mean dangerous degradation products. Some could be:

  • Des-amino variants (minor structural differences)
  • Oxidized forms (common with peptides)
  • Aggregates that partially resolved on the column

That said, 82% is still well below any reasonable standard. For context, Novo Nordisk's branded Ozempic and Wegovy typically test at 98-101% purity. Research-grade semaglutide from reputable suppliers is usually ≥95%.

I'd stop using this vial immediately and contact the pharmacy. Ask them to test a retained sample from your batch (they're required to keep one). If their retained sample also tests low, you have a serious quality issue. If theirs tests fine, then something happened during shipping to Janoshik.

5 23NurseLeah_Nash, gary_naperville, sean_dublin and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SteveThurs
Member
523
2,345
Sep 2024
Wisconsin
Online
Mar 11, 2026 at 6:48 AM#5

Wait, I've been using the same pharmacy. Should I be worried?? I've been on their compounded sema for 2 months and haven't had any side effects beyond the normal nausea. Does low purity mean it's dangerous or just less effective?

11 9TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register