🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsProgress & Lab ResultsDEXA scan comparison — looking for input Page 2

DEXA scan comparison — looking for input

pete_manc_UK Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 3:20 AM 13 replies 1,819 viewsPage 2 of 3
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Jul 12, 2024 at 6:10 AM#6

This aligns with the emerging literature. The STEP-HFpEF trial and several smaller studies have shown that when adequate protein intake and resistance training are maintained, the proportion of weight lost as lean mass can be reduced from the typical 25-40% range down to 10-15% or potentially even lower.

The key variables appear to be: protein intake above 1.2g/kg/day, progressive resistance training at least 3x/week, and avoiding excessively rapid weight loss. You hit all three.

For anyone reading this who's NOT currently doing resistance training on GLP-1 therapy — please start. You don't need a PPL split or anything complicated. Even 2-3 days per week of basic compound movements will make a meaningful difference in lean mass preservation.

4 19rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
robert_kc
Member
289
1,234
Oct 2024
Kansas City, MO
Jul 12, 2024 at 6:27 AM#7

This is exactly what I needed to see. I've been terrified of starting semaglutide because of the muscle loss stories. I lift 3x/week already so it sounds like I just need to keep that up and prioritize protein. Starting next week.

41 21SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Jul 12, 2024 at 6:44 AM#8
Appendicular lean mass (arms + legs — the best proxy for actual skeletal muscle) INCREASED by 2.6 lbs.

Even with the creatine caveat, this is outstanding. Most of the scary "muscle wasting" headlines are based on studies where participants did zero resistance training and had low protein intake. When you actually control those variables, the outcomes look completely different.

I'd also add: at 34.8% body fat, you were solidly in the "overfat" category. People with higher body fat tend to lose proportionally more fat and less lean during weight loss, especially when training. This may be harder to replicate for someone starting at 22% body fat.

41 8DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy and 38 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards

Similar Threads

100 lbs lost in 14 months — comprehensive DEXA and lab data16 replies
12-month metabolic panel comparison — before and after GLP-122 replies
A1C from 9.2 to 5.4 in 8 months — my diabetes reversal journey16 replies
6-month body recomposition — DEXA, labs, progress photos22 replies
1-year semaglutide anniversary — honest review with all data16 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register