🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsCOA & Analytical TestingPaid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA — looking for input Page 4

Paid for independent testing and results did not match vendor COA — looking for input

PurityPaulOR Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 4:26 AM 19 replies 2,175 viewsPage 4 of 4
PurityPaulOR
Senior Member
1,890
7,890
Mar 2024
Oregon
Oct 29, 2023 at 10:06 AM#16

OP here — wow, did not expect this much response! Thank you all for the thoughtful replies on Paid for independent.

To answer pat_auckland: my doctor and I discussed the options and went with brand.

Quick update: I have noticed more improvement since posting this. Thanks again for the evidence-based discussion — this is exactly why I posted in a science-based community. 🙏

14 18Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
Oct 29, 2023 at 10:23 AM#17

Adding my data to this Paid for independent discussion:

MetricBaselineMonth 5Month 6
Weight248 lbs238 lbs203 lbs
A1C7.2%6.0%5.2%
hsCRP7.04.00.6

Protocol: Semaglutide 1.7mg/wk, resistance training 3x/wk, protein 1.5g/kg/day.

Last edited: Oct 29, 2023 at 1:23 PM
26 7Admin, Dr.Martinez, mike_mod and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jason_sac26
New Member
34
123
Jan 2026
Sacramento, CA
Oct 29, 2023 at 10:40 AM#18

Can confirm — exactly what happened to me.

49 12stefan_berlin, Dr.EM_Chicago, pete_RVA and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
mike.trainer_LA
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Apr 2024
Los Angeles, CA
Oct 29, 2023 at 10:57 AM#19

Slightly tangential to Paid for independent but hans_munich reminded me — what is the latest on the oral formulations?

I know it is not exactly on-topic but it seems related enough to ask here rather than starting a new thread. Apologies if this has been covered — I did search first.

8 12LeilaHI, marcus_mpls, DeniseRN_TPA and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
nancy_portland
Member
345
1,567
Aug 2024
Portland, ME
Oct 29, 2023 at 11:14 AM#20

+1 to PurityPaulOR. Especially the point about "Thank you all for the thoughtful replies..." — I have seen the same in my own experience with Paid for independent.

Last edited: Oct 29, 2023 at 12:14 PM
33 22claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

HPLC vs UPLC for peptide purity — method comparison study18 replies
Mass spectrometry for peptide identity verification — ESI-MS guide7 replies
Endotoxin testing methods — LAL vs recombinant Factor C17 replies
Red flags on COAs — how to spot a fake certificate5 replies
USP reference standards for peptide verification — sourcing guide3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register